Thursday, January 22, 2015

Workforce grants in N. NV

Looking into the $20 million in grants,  as far as manufacturing goes, it seems GBC and TMCC only focus on one thing,  Machining.  Now,  I'll agree that machining is an important aspect of manufacturing, but so is the maintenance of those machines, and the pneumatic hydraulic, electrical, and electronic systems that run them  AND the rest of the manufacturing process.  Industry can only absorb so many "machinists" ...  but this seems to be the main focus (GBC is the exception,  they seem to realize that there are multiple facets to an Applied Industrial Technology program).  While it looks like Tesla will have no problem finding trained machinists, heaven help them finding trained electricians, electronic techs, instrumentation & control techs, automation techs, (and on and on and on).  N. NV is also a big warehousing area.  Have you ever seen the automated systems it takes to run a high-tech warehouse?  NO, we are NOT turning out the well rounded technical workforce NV needs.  Time to rectify this before its too late.

OK,  my enthusiasm has peaked, and going downhill fast.  Even though NV community colleges have received MAJOR Dept of Labor grants for vocational/technical education (about $20 million between the three CC's in Northern NV)...  No one seems to be hiring any new Industrial Technology instructors.  I think thats kind of strange.  Looking over programs, only GBC seems to have a good variety of classes for Manufacturing.  One would think, especially since Tesla's new factory lies in GBC "sphere of influence" that they would be actively recruiting.
Possibly if the new "Obama initiative" is passed maybe.....



Department of Labor's Grant Application and Award Database
TAACCCT - 2014
ETA
$9,921,831
TAACCCT - 2013
ETA
$8,778,829
TAACCCT – 2011
ETA
$2,701,202
http://webapps.dol.gov/DOLGrantData/KeywordSearch.aspx?parameter=NevadaB
 


NV sure better do something......   we are ranked next to the bottom on education.

Nevada    49th out of 50
Overall grade: D
State score: 65.0
Per-pupil spending: $8,141 (5th lowest)
High school graduation rate: 60.0% (the lowest)
Eighth-graders proficient in math or reading: 28.3% (10th lowest)
Less than 34% of children in Nevada had at least one parent with a post-secondary degree, the lowest rate nationwide. Since parents play perhaps the most important role in a child’s chance for success, poor educational attainment rates among adults in Nevada were likely a factor in children’s relatively poor achievements in school. Similarly, early education can set the stage for a child’s entire academic career. Young children in Nevada were among the least likely nationwide to attend preschool or kindergarten. With the lowest high school graduation rate in the country, at 60% in 2012, young adults in Nevada were also far less likely to pursue further education than their peers in most states. While 55.1% of American young adults were enrolled in or had completed a post-secondary degree program, just 40.5% in Nevada were — nearly the lowest rate.

And giving the students job skills, instead of "book learning" would go a LONG way to solving this problem

Thursday, January 08, 2015

Expanding technical training programs:



OK.. I'm REALLY excited about expanding Technical Training programs. I've been on my soap-box about this for the past 20+ years. I see the failing half-hearted attempt (especially here in NV) to provide workforce/vocational technical training through the Community College System. I have been proposing a statewide Technical College system here for almost as long. Come on NV,, now is the time to get this going.... A working model is in place....

Expanding technical training programs:
President Obama also proposed the new American Technical Training Fund, which will expand innovative, high-quality technical training programs across the country. Specifically, the fund will award programs that:
1) Have strong employer partnerships and include work-based learning opportunities
2) Provide accelerated training
3) Accommodate part-time work

The American Technical Training Fund is based off a program called Tennessee Tech Centers,  a statewide system of 27 institutions providing a wide range of rigorous, one to two year, technical/occupational education programs at consistently high completion and placement rates in high skill and relatively high wage employment.

The education model represented by the Centers contrasts sharply with how conventional postsecondary education – especially public community colleges – has been organized. This model also produces very different results, particularly in terms of the rates of student success in completing their programs. This assessment how this occurs seems particularly timely given the rising concern that community colleges, as the nation‘s main postsecondary vehicle for workforce education, are failing unacceptably large numbers of people who simply do not complete their programs.

A review of IPEDS data reveals that of 1,145 two-year, public postsecondary institutions in U.S., only 105 (about 9 percent) can report an average ―150 percent of time‖ graduation rate above 50% for the last five years.2 All twenty-seven Technology Centers are included in that group; during those five years the Technology Centers averaged above 70% completion. There is no other state postsecondary system that comes anywhere close to achieving these outcomes.