A $100,000 Factory Job. What's Uncool About That?
A $100,000 Factory Job. What's Uncool About That?
By Parija Kavilanz | CNNMoney.com –
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/100-000-factory-job-whats-154000356.html
What's uncool about a $100,000 factory job? These days not much. In
fact, factory jobs -- once considered back-breaking and low-paying --
have become high-tech and high-salaried.
Still young people don't get it,
say factory owners, who can't find enough skilled workers.
"When I was an apprentice in the late '70s, kids were dying to get into
manufacturing.
There were plenty of factory jobs," said Joe Sedlak, a machinist who
owns the Chesapeake Machine Company in Baltimore. "There are jobs for
the taking today. But kids don't want them."
Stereotypes about factory jobs still persist. And the media isn't helping, factory owners complain.
[Related:
Earn $1 Million by Climbing the Corporate Ladder]
"On TV, kids don't see many positive images of manufacturing," said
Bill Mach, president of Mach Mold, a manufacturer of plastics molds in
Benton Harbor, Mich. A show will have a scene with "an old dark building
with a bird flying out of it, and something bad happens."
Scott Paul, executive director of the Alliance for American
Manufacturing, agreed. "Pop culture has a big impact on young people,"
he said, adding that the only recent positive pop culture depiction of
manufacturing that he can think of has been in Iron Man.
The industry needs an image boost, and young people need to get educated about high-skilled factory jobs, experts said.
An aspiring machinist -- a popular factory job -- can start training
at 18 and then do a one- or two-year manufacturing apprenticeship. In
five years, he or she could be making more than $50,000. In 10 years,
that could double to $100,000.
Not a bad salary for a 28-year-old.
"If you're really good at your work, you could remain employed for a
very long time, because there are so few of us," said Sedlak.
Sedlak's top worker makes $30 an hour. And annual pay at his company
ranges between $70,000 and $80,000 with overtime. In 31 years, only
three workers have retired from his factory.
Still, with almost 13 million unemployed Americans, including many high school graduates, he is struggling to fill positions.
A recent Manufacturing Institute and Deloitte report underscores
that. Manufacturers currently have 600,000 vacancies nationwide, it
said.
"When we pushed manufacturing out of the country, we pushed job opportunities out," said Sedlak.
The downward spiral that followed was swift. With jobs gone, schools
ended vocational classes. Kids lost interest in manufacturing. Many
states stopped sponsoring apprentice programs in factories.
In early spring, Justin Lavanway, 17, and two of his high school
buddies, toured Mach Mold to learn more about manufacturing and its
jobs.
His grandfather was a career machinist with Whirlpool. "I saw that it
was a pretty stable career for him," said Lavanway. "That's why I'm
keeping my options open."
States to manufacturers: We want you!
But his friends, Joseph Johnson, 18, who is thinking about a job in
medical services, and Charlie Leaf, 18, who wants pursue a career in
psychiatry, are not interested in manufacturing.
"The public school system tells students that we have to go to
college to be successful," said Johnson. "Ever since you're young, you
hear that's what you have to do to achieve the American dream."
Johnson and Leaf also don't think manufacturing offers stable careers.
Mach hears this often from young people, even through manufacturing
is a deep-rooted profession through generations of families in Southwest
Michigan.
And it's just not true, he said. "I have 40 people in my plant. Half have been there for 15 to 25 years."
"There's no easy answer to how we can change manufacturing's image
problem," said Paul. Companies themselves have to be up to that
challenge, he said.
One idea is to turn to pop culture, said Paul.
"Maybe we need someone cool like Clint Eastwood to say, 'Go work in factories' as a follow up to his Super Bowl Chrysler ad."
A Nation That’s Losing Its Toolbox
A Nation That’s Losing Its Toolbox
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/22/business/what-happened-to-the-craftsmanship-spirit-essay.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=general&src=me
THE scene inside the
Home Depot on Weyman Avenue here would give the old-time American craftsman pause.
In Aisle 34 is precut vinyl flooring, the glue already in place. In
Aisle 26 are prefab windows. Stacked near the checkout counters, and as
colorful as a Fisher-Price toy, is a not-so-serious-looking power tool: a
battery-operated saw-and-drill combo. And if you don’t want to be your
own handyman, head to Aisle 23 or Aisle 35, where a help desk will
arrange for an installer.
It’s all very handy stuff, I guess, a convenient way to be a
do-it-yourselfer without being all that good with tools. But at a time
when the American factory seems to be a shrinking presence, and when
good manufacturing jobs have vanished, perhaps never to return, there is
something deeply troubling about this dilution of American
craftsmanship.
This isn’t a lament — or not merely a lament — for bygone times. It’s a
social and cultural issue, as well as an economic one. The Home Depot
approach to craftsmanship — simplify it, dumb it down, hire a contractor
— is one signal that mastering tools and working with one’s hands is
receding in America as a hobby, as a valued skill, as a cultural
influence that shaped thinking and behavior in vast sections of the
country.
That should be a matter of concern in a presidential election year. Yet
neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney promotes himself as tool-savvy
presidential timber, in the mold of a Jimmy Carter, a skilled carpenter
and cabinet maker.
The Obama administration does worry publicly about manufacturing, a
first cousin of craftsmanship. When the Ford Motor Company, for example,
recently announced that it was bringing some production home, the White
House cheered. “When you see things like Ford moving new production
from Mexico to Detroit, instead of the other way around, you know things
are changing,” says
Gene B. Sperling, director of the National Economic Council.
Ask the administration or the Republicans or most academics why America
needs more manufacturing, and they respond that manufacturing spawns
innovation, brings down the trade deficit, strengthens the dollar,
generates jobs, arms the military and kindles a recovery from
recession.
But rarely, if ever, do they publicly take the argument a step further,
asserting that a growing manufacturing sector encourages craftsmanship
and that craftsmanship is, if not a birthright, then a vital ingredient
of the American self-image as a can-do, inventive, we-can-make-anything
people.
That self-image is deteriorating. And the symptoms go far beyond Home
Depot. They show up in the wistful popularity of books like
“Shop Class as Soulcraft,” by Matthew B. Crawford, in TV cooking classes featuring the craftsmanship of celebrity chefs, and in shows like
“This Old House.”
Traditional vocational training in public high schools is gradually
declining, stranding thousands of young people who seek training for a
craft without going to college. Colleges, for their part, have since
1985 graduated fewer chemical, mechanical, industrial and metallurgical
engineers, partly in response to the reduced role of manufacturing, a
big employer of them.
The decline started in the 1950s, when manufacturing generated a hefty
28 percent of the national income, or gross domestic product, and
employed one-third of the work force. Today, factory output generates
just 12 percent of G.D.P. and employs barely 9 percent of the nation’s
workers.
Mass layoffs and plant closings have drawn plenty of headlines and
public debate over the years, and they still occasionally do. But the
damage to skill and craftsmanship — what’s needed to build a complex
airliner or a tractor, or for a worker to move up from assembler to
machinist to supervisor — went largely unnoticed.
“In an earlier generation, we lost our connection to the land, and now
we are losing our connection to the machinery we depend on,” says
Michael Hout, a sociologist at the University of California, Berkeley.
“People who work with their hands,” he went on, “are doing things today
that we call service jobs, in restaurants and laundries, or in medical
technology and the like.”
That’s one explanation for the decline in traditional craftsmanship.
Lack of interest is another. The big money is in fields like finance.
Starting in the 1980s, skill in finance grew in stature, and, as
depicted in the news media and the movies, became a more appealing
source of income.
By last year, Wall Street traders, bankers and those who deal in real
estate generated 21 percent of the national income, double their share
in the 1950s. And Warren E. Buffett, the amiable financier, became a
homespun folk hero, without the tools and overalls.
Manufacturing’s shrinking presence undoubtedly helps explain the decline
in craftsmanship, if only because many of the nation’s assembly line
workers were skilled in craft work, if not on the job then in their
spare time. In a late 1990s study of blue-collar employees at a General
Motors plant (now closed) in Linden, N.J.,
the sociologist Ruth Milkman
of City University of New York found that many line workers, in their
off-hours, did home renovation and other skilled work.
“I have often thought,” Ms. Milkman says, “that these extracurricular
jobs were an effort on the part of the workers to regain their dignity
after suffering the degradation of repetitive assembly line work in the
factory.”
Craft work has higher status in nations like Germany, which invests in
apprenticeship programs for high school students. “Corporations in
Germany realized that there was an interest to be served economically
and patriotically in building up a skilled labor force at home; we never
had that ethos,” says
Richard Sennett, a New York University sociologist who
has written about the connection of craft and culture.
The damage to American craftsmanship seems to parallel the precipitous
slide in manufacturing employment. Though the decline started in the
1970s, it became much steeper beginning in 2000. Since then, some 5.3
million jobs, or one-third of the work force in manufacturing, have been
lost. A stated goal of the Obama administration is to restore a big
chunk of this employment, along with the multitude of skills that many
of the jobs required.
Don Yadda, a sales representative for the Home Depot,
visited a job site in Larchmont, N.Y., where windows were being
installed.
And there is an incipient upturn in the monthly employment data,
although the president will almost certainly finish his first term with
the manufacturing work force well below the 12.6 million it was when his
administration began. (It was nearly 11.9 million last month.)
“We sit in rooms with manufacturers who tell us that location decisions
to move overseas that were previously automatic are now a close call,
and that the right policies can make a difference,” Mr. Sperling says.
THAT is particularly the case if federal, state and local governments
intervene with generous subsidies, like those seen in China, Germany,
Japan, France, India and other countries eager to sustain manufacturing.
Government subsidies are helping to make manufacturing in America more
attractive, but the turnaround may be hard to sustain. And it may be too
late. Big multinationals already operate factory networks in Europe and
Asia, as well as in the United States. Stepping up exports to those
markets from the United States, rather than producing in them, is
becoming less of an option — short of an international agreement like
the Plaza Accord of 1985, which realigned currencies and gave American
manufacturers a temporary boost.
As for craftsmanship itself, the issue is how to preserve it as a valued
skill in the general population. Ms. Milkman, the sociologist, argues
that American craftsmanship isn’t disappearing as quickly as some would
argue — that it has instead shifted to immigrants. “Pride in craft, it
is alive in the immigrant world,” she says.
Sol Axelrod, 37, the manager of the Home Depot here, fittingly learned
to fix his own car as a teenager, even changing the brakes. Now he finds
immigrant craftsmen gathered in abundance outside his store in the
early morning, waiting for it to open so they can buy supplies for the
day’s work as contractors. Skilled
day laborers, also mostly immigrants, wait quietly in hopes of being hired by the contractors.
Mr. Axelrod also says the recession and persistently high unemployment
have forced many people to try to save money by doing more themselves,
and Home Depot in response offers classes in fixing faucets and other
simple repairs. The teachers are store employees, many of them older and
semiretired from a skilled trade, or laid off.
“Our customers may not be building cabinets or outdoor decks; we try to
do that for them,” Mr. Axelrod says, “but some are trying to build up
skill so they can do more for themselves in these hard times.”
